On a NYC bus recently, I watched a toddler bounce from seat to seat, across the aisle, and over feet and backpacks – all without realizing that (a) he was endangering himself and (b) he was totally annoying everyone else. Everyone but his caregiver, that is, who was busy texting and who contributed nothing more to the situation than an occasional “settle down,” murmured to the screen, which presumably paid as little attention to her words as did the toddler, who limited himself to “no,” shouted often and earnestly. I contemplated the little sign that appears on every NYC bus, explaining that “assaulting a bus operator is a felony.”
Only bus drivers?
What about assaulting a toddler, I mused. Felony? Misdemeanor? Was I willing to risk a misdemeanor to achieve a quiet ride? (I’m kidding. Really. I’d never hit a kid, or anyone else for that matter.)
Finally, the texter rose to leave, calling, “Holden, this is our stop!” as she grabbed his hand. Holden – famously rebellious protagonist of Salinger’s “The Catcher in the Rye.” Yup, I thought. Perfect name for the future juvenile delinquent, who someday can rightfully plead neglectful parenting as an excuse for bad behavior.
But I digress. The point of this post is actually a recent study about language acquisition and children, inspired by Holden’s repeated shouts of “no.” Researchers found that worldwide, most kids say “no” much earlier (and more frequently) than “yes.” Why? Well, common sense provides the answer. Who would bother answering a caregiver cooing, “Baby want a toy?” If the baby wants a toy, the baby takes it. “No,” on the other hand, serves a purpose. A positive action is easy to perform, a negative not so much.
My experience with Holden has led me to change my habits: Faced again with an unruly toddler, I now put on my best teacher face, stare at the kid, and quietly hiss, “No.” Invariably, the kid subsides, the caregiver continues texting, the other bus riders smile, and the journey continues. No misdemeanors or felonies necessary.
Now if I could only get this technique to work on sidewalk-bicyclists.
Oh, grrrrr! Unruly kids, blast ’em! Especially on planes, the worst!!! Love that his name was Holden, lol!!
Dogs, too, respond to a firm “No!” I personally do not appreciate being approached by dogs I don’t know (and vice versa) and invariably they are illegally off-leash – as if that mattered. “No” seems to stop them in their track; their expression seems to be one of surprise (“Oh, you know that word too”).
I have only ever been approached by a cat after assiduously and elaborately ignoring it. (I admit occasionally dangling a hand at sniffing level, while continuing to show utter ignorance of its presence. Works every time!)
Perhaps we should apply these techniques to politicians? Both saying “no” and “elaborately ignoring” might go a long way toward civilizing the campaign.
If only. They’re talking so loudly themselves that’s all they can hear…
Kids are not always easy to control as they are seemingly full of Energizer bunny-like energy, bringing me to wonder occasionally if we should harness the power of kids to solve any future energy crisis. Solar power? Wind power? No, Kid power. I freely offer my oldest kid to be a test subject. As long as he has a steady supply of Pokemon, PJ Masks, and Jake and the Neverland Pirates, Orion would be thrilled.
Seriously though, how hard is it to look away from your cell phone to discipline your child? Also, Holden. Because I thought Orion’s name was bad.
Great idea. Someone should install energy absorbing platforms on sidewalks outside schools. The burst of power released by kids at the end of the school day would probably yield enough energy to replace fossil fuels.